Showing posts with label cpsia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cpsia. Show all posts

20 August 2009

Important CPSIA Update: Final Rule

The CPSIA Commission yesterday (19 August 2009) released its Final Rule on lead determinations. This 65-page document includes final determinations on requested exemptions, and the explanations for why each determination was made. Most notable improvements/ exemptions are the following:
  • Textiles in general, both natural and synthetic, have been exempted from mandatory testing. (This does NOT include any after-treatment applications or embellishments, such as screen printing, decals, etc.) Page 31-33
  • Modern ordinary bound books, printed with the CMYK method and meeting several other requirements, have been exempted from testing. (This does NOT include spiral bound either metal or plastic - or novelty books which are or contain plastic, metal or electronic parts, etc.) Page 37-49
  • Precious metals and gems, as well as many semiprecious gems and minerals, are largely exempt from testing. (Once they have been altered, or used in conjunction with a non-exempt process or component, the exemption does not apply.) Pages 4-5, 25-26
  • A wide variety of natural (plant and animal) products, in their unadulterated states, have been exempted from testing. Pages 4-5, 15-16, 35

Some other notable determinations:

  • Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) may NOT be used to demonstrate CPSIA compliance of any materials or components used to construct/manufacture children's products, as they do not certify that lead levels are within or below the lawful limits. Page 53-54
  • Component testing of metal, plastic and painted parts - such as zippers, buttons, snaps, etc. - will still be required at this time, although the Commission will revisit the topic for further determinations:
"The Commission intends to address component part testing and the establishment of protocols and standards for ensuring that children's products are tested for compliance with applicable children's products safety rules, as well as products that fall within an exemption, in an upcoming rulemaking." Pages 54-56
  • The Commission will continue to consider requests for exemption that are accompanied by the proper documentation and test data to support the request:
"The list of determinations made in this rule is not exhaustive; the Commission will continue to evaluate other requests on materials or products submitted under the procedures rule, and consider whether to re-evaluate a material if new evidence indicates that a re-evaluation is warranted or the Commission receives data or information demonstrating that a particular material does not and would not contain lead. In such circumstances, the Commission will amend the rule, if appropriate." Page 12

Here is the summary of the Final Rule, copied directly from the document released by the Commission (page 60-64):

J. Conclusion
For the reasons stated above, the Commission amends title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 1500 -HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND ARTICLES:
ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT REGULATIONS
1. The authority for part 1500 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1261-1278, 122 Stat. 3016.

2. Add a new §1500.91 to read as follows:

§ 1500.91 Determinations Regarding Lead Content for Certain Materials
or Products under Section 101 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act.

(a) The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act provides for specific lead limits in children's products. Section 101(a) of the CPSIA provides that by February 10, 2009, products designed or intended primarily for children 12 and younger may not contain more than 600 ppm of lead. After August 14, 2009, products designed or intended primarily for children 12 and younger cannot contain more than 300 ppm of lead. On August 14, 2011, the limit may be further reduced to 100 ppm, unless the Commission determines that it is not technologically feasible to have this lower limit. Paint, coatings or electroplating may not be considered a barrier that would make the lead content of a product inaccessible to a child. Materials used in products intended primarily for children 12 and younger that are treated or coated with paint or similar surface-coating materials that are subject to 16 CFR part 1303, must comply with the requirements for lead paint under section 14(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), as amended by section 102(a) of the CPSIA.

(b) Section 3 of the CPSIA grants the Commission general rulemaking authority to issue regulations, as necessary, either on its own initiative or upon the request of any interested person, to make a determination that a material or product does not exceed the lead limits as provided under paragraph (a) of this section.

(c) A determination by the Commission under paragraph (b) of this section that a material or product does not contain lead levels that exceed 600 ppm, 300 ppm, or 100 ppm, as applicable, does not relieve the material or product from complying with the applicable lead limit as provided under paragraph (a) of this section if the product or material is changed or altered so that it exceeds the lead content limits.

(d) The following materials do not exceed the lead content limits under section 101(a) of the CPSIA provided that these materials have neither been treated or adulterated with the addition of materials that could result in the addition of lead into the product or material:

(1)Precious gemstones: diamond, ruby, sapphire, emerald

(2) Semiprecious gemstones and other minerals, provided that the mineral or material is not based on lead or lead compounds and is not associated in nature with any mineral based on lead or lead compounds (excluding any mineral that is based on lead or lead compounds including, but not limited to, the following: aragonite, bayldonite, boleite, cerussite, crocoite, galena, linarite, mimetite, phosgenite, vanadinite, and wulfenite)

(3) Natural or cultured pearls.

(4) Wood.

(5) Paper and similar materials made from wood or other cellulosic fiber, including, but not limited to, paperboard, linerboard and medium, and coatings on such paper which become part of the substrate.

(6) CMYK process printing inks (excluding spot colors, other inks that are not used in CMYK process, inks that do not become part of the substrate under 16 CFR part 1303, and inks used in after-treatment applications, including screen prints, transfers, decals, or other prints) .

(7) Textiles (excluding after-treatment applications, including screen prints, transfers, decals, or other prints) consisting of:

(a) Natural fibers (dyed or undyed) including, but not limited to, cotton, kapok, flax, linen, jute, ramie, hemp, kenaf, bamboo, coir, sisal, silk, wool (sheep), alpaca, llama, goat (mohair, cashmere), rabbit (angora), camel, horse, yak, vicuna, qiviut, guanaco;

(b) Manufactured fibers (dyed or undyed) including, but not limited to, rayon, azlon, lyocell, acetate, triacetate, rubber, polyester, olefin, nylon, acrylic, modacrylic, aramid, spandex.

(8) Other plant-derived and animal-derived materials including, but not limited to, animal glue, bee's wax, seeds, nut shells, flowers, bone, sea shell, coral, amber, feathers, fur, leather.

(e) The following metals and alloys do not exceed the lead content limits under section 101(a) of the CPSIA, provided that no lead or lead-containing metal is intentionally added but does not include the non-steel or non-precious metal components of a product, such as solder or base metals in electroplate, clad, or fill applications:

(1) Surgical steel and other stainless steel within the designations of Unified Numbering System, UNS S13800 S66286, not including the stainless steel designated as 303Pb (UNS S30360) .

(2) Precious metals: gold (at least 10 karat); sterling silver (at least 925/1000); platinum; palladium; rhodium; osmium; iridium; ruthenium, titanium.


Please take the time to read the complete Final Rule document here:
http://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/frnotices/fr09/leaddeterminationsfinalrule-draft.pdf

**********



Other important CPSIA links:

http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/cpsia.html


Of particular interest to Small Businesses, Resellers, Crafters and Charities:
http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/cpsiasbguide.html

To keep abreast of any CPSIA news and developments, sign up here to be notified by e-mail:
https://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/cpsialist.aspx


**********
Editorial comment:

Obviously, CPSIA and its Final Rule are imperfect. The hasty rush to draft and enact what was supposed to have been a protective law has ultimately, and adversely, affected small businesses, charitable organizations, non-profits, and everyday craftspersons, as well as the average American consumer. Hopefully, through continued efforts by concerned citizens and business owners, CPSIA will eventually evolve into a practical, common-sense piece of legislation that will achieve its intended objective without causing further, or continued, harm.

Kudos to the many, many, many dedicated people across the nation who took action by researching, writing letters, attending meetings, blogging and using various other media, to both challenge or hone the law, and inform businesspersons and the public. Your vigilance and perseverance has made a difference. Keep up the good work!

30 January 2009

NewsFlash: CPSIA Stay of Enforcement Granted

Effective immediately, the CPSC has granted a one year stay of enforcement of the CPSIA. This is fabulous news for small businesses, handcrafters, vintage sellers, libraries, and environmentalists, etc. as well as for the consumers who support them.

There are certain exceptions noted on pages 2 and 3 of the drafted stay (pages 4 and 5 of the PDF document linked below):

(1) those where testing and certification was required by subsection 14(a) of the CPSA prior to enactment of the CPSIA; and
(2) those requirements, when they become effective, applicable to children's product certifications required to be supported by third party testing for which the Commission has issued requirements for acceptance of accreditation of third party testing laboratories to test for:
  • lead paint (effective for products manufactured after December 21, 2008),
  • full-size and non-full size cribs and pacifiers [effective for products manufactured after January 20, 2009],
  • small parts (effective for products manufactured after February 15, 2009), and
  • metal components of children's metal jewelry (effective for products manufactured after March 23, 2009);
and
(3) any and all certifications expressly required by CPSC regulations; and
(4) the certifications required due to certain requirements of the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act being defined as consumer safety "rules;" and
(5) the certifications of compliance required for ATVs in section 42(a) (2) (B) of the CPSC which were added by CPSIA; and
(6) any voluntary guarantees provided for in the Flammable Fabric Act ("FFA") or otherwise (to the extent a guarantor wishes to issue one).
Read the full details here:
http://www.cpsc.gov/library/foia/foia09/brief/stayenforce.pdf

For an easier read, check out this Etsy Storque article:
Breaking News: The CPSIA Mandatory Testing & Certification Has Been Suspended for a Year

And for a more cautionary report on this latest development:
CPSIA: CPSC staff asks 1-year enforcement stay

Many thanks to all who participated in the push for a second, more realistic and more practical, look at this legislation. Let's hope the necessary amendments will be carefully drafted over the coming year. Keep the pressure on and keep spreading the word.

Kudos all around!

[Edited to include the complete list of CPSC exceptions.]

[Edited to include the following:]


As more complete information comes to light, it is clear that there is a very long road ahead. And, unfortunately, sellers of vintage items (if they are intended for children 12 and under), makers of recycled/upcycled products, and charitable organizations and thrift shops will likely be the hardest hit, as they are NOT exempt from the more stringent, and now retro-active, lead and phthalate requirements.

Be sure to carefully read the following:
http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09115.html

http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09115nord.pdf

http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09115moore.pdf

29 January 2009

CPSIA - More Ways to Take Action

Here are a few more links to help in the fight to amend the CPSIA. These measures are time sensitive, as the CPSC will stop gathering comments and complaints on this issue after January 3o, 2009 (tomorrow). Please take a moment to explore these options and make a difference wherever you can.

Ask CPSC to Clarify New Child Products Rules to Protect Safe Handmade Toys and Clothes

Etsy's CPSIA Action Kit

Small Business Administration
- possibly a powerful ally in the fight against unreasonable federal restrictions/requirements that CPSIA will impose on small businesses

CPSC itself is inviting comments on component testing.

28 January 2009

CPSIA: What's It All About?

On September 12, 2007, Congressman Mark Pryor, D-Arkansas, introduced the Consumer Protection Safety Improvement Act, a bill that was intended to protect children from exposure to toxic products. After the recent influx of harmful toys and other children's products from China, this was meant to be a relief to parents and concerned consumers all across the nation. It became law on August 14, 2008 and is scheduled to become effective February 10, 2009. However, a closer look reveals it to be a poorly crafted and extreme piece of legislation that has more potential to cause harm than to do good. Rather than carefully researching the topic and drafting a law that would underscore the importance of child safety and place proper restrictions and requirements on major manufacturers and importers, it has created a hostile environment for any but the largest makers of children’s goods. By requiring a battery of expensive tests for each and every item and certification for all components – including resale goods - it is poised to shut down thousands of small businesses and bring many charitable companies and practices to a screeching halt.

The law (not for the fainthearted or the legalese-impaired):
http://www.cpsc.gov/cpsia.pdf
http://www.cpsc.gov/ABOUT/Cpsia/cpsia.HTML
http://www.cpsc.gov/ABOUT/Cpsia/legislation.html#summaries

In layman’s terms: Any and all products that are made for, or marketed to, children 12 and under will be subject to the new laws and testing and/or certification requirements. Testing is for lead, flammability, and certain phthalates, and can run into the hundreds or thousands of dollars per item. (For a few cost examples, see here; and for a list of approved labs, see here.) Every individual component and/or color combination of an item (for example: fabric, thread, filler, buttons and other embellishments for a plush toy; paper, ink, board, and all binding materials for a children’s book) must be tested.

What this means for small businesses, resale shops and charitable organizations: Families, individuals, and small companies which specialize in handmade or limited production children’s items will be forced out of business as they will be unable to absorb the costs of testing and certification. Resale shops, although exempt from direct testing, will be forced to stop reselling all used children’s goods, as they will likely be unable to certify that those goods fall within safe-testing limits. Non-profits will be unable to collect and distribute any used children’s products, as they will not be able to certify that all goods are within CPSIA limits.

What this means for handcrafters: Aside from being grossly cost prohibitive, this will effectively eliminate the creation and sale of any handmade and one-of-a-kind (ooak) children’s products, as the testing consumes the components being tested. Obviously, this will put many small and micro businesses out of commission.

What this means for individuals: Consumers will no longer have the option to choose between mass manufactured, resale, recycled, or individually crafted children’s clothes, toys, books, furniture, jewelry, etc. Expensive testing and certification will drive up the costs of all children’s products. School and art supplies and science kits/materials, as well as some sports equipment, will be subject to testing, and will increase in price while likely decreasing in availability. Trips to the library and bookstore may become a thing of the past as libraries and shops may be forced to pull thousands of books from shelves and/or ban children under twelve from walking through their doors.

Yes, it all seems quite extreme. But these are the realities US families, consumers and businesspeople will be facing if the CPSIA is not carefully and realistically amended before its implementation on February 10.

Public outcries have been pouring in from every corner of the US. Protests and petitions have been launched. Are these people who oppose the new law against improved measures for child safety? Far from it. What they are asking for is a more realistic approach to the problem. More cost-efficient testing methods; use of certification from manufacturers of supplies to show compliance in products created from those supplies; exemption for certain categories of items that are not intended for children (ie: certain antiques and collectibles, and products made with raw or untreated materials), etc.

What can be done? Get the facts – search ‘cpsia’ or check out the sampling of links below. Join forces with thousands of others in petitioning congress to re-visit the legislation and amend the requirements.

Get informed:
http://www.etsy.com/storque/search/title/cpsia/
http://www.etsy.com/forums_thread.php?thread_id=6002704#post-33926638
Get involved:
http://www.change.org/ideas/view/save_handmade_toys_from_the_cpsia
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/reform-cpsia-hr4040.html
http://capwiz.com/americanapparel/issues/alert/?alertid=12274476
http://blog.buyhandmade.org/
http://www.etsy.com/forums_thread.php?thread_id=6013238
http://nationalbankruptcyday.com/about/
A series of excellent articles:
Scrap The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act
Scrap The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act--II
Scrap The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act--III

The bottom line is this: we can protect our kids without going to extremes, and without eliminating jobs and choices.
Demand a smart law – not a reactionary one.